๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜ = ๐—ข๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ?

Me: โ€œYou remind me of my childhood crush, pup.โ€
My son: โ€œOoh lala lala! Tell me who?โ€
Me: โ€œMowgli from Jungle Book.โ€
Adi: โ€œWhat? Why? Is that even a compliment?โ€
Me: โ€œObviously not! Look at your hair, boy. I can barely see your face. Can you please cut your hair for Godโ€™s sake?โ€

My boy just went back to his books.
Me: โ€œAdi, are you even listening?โ€
Adi: โ€œOf course Iโ€™m listening. Iโ€™m just choosing not to obey you.โ€

That line stopped me in my tracks.

Growing up in a lower-middle-class Hindu household, I had learnt that if you were listening, you followed. If you didnโ€™t follow, you werenโ€™t respectful. I learnt that respect often meant obedience. Saying yes was safer than asking why.

As I sat with my sonโ€™s cheeky push-back, I recognised that even today, when Iโ€™m in groups, I notice a voice in me: โ€œCarefulโ€”your objection might sound disrespectful.โ€

This isnโ€™t just personal. It is cultural.

In Indian context, respect is vertical. It flows upwardโ€”towards parents, teachers, leaders. Questioning authority can easily be seen as breaking respect.

By contrast, in many Western contexts, respect is experienced as horizontal. Speaking your mindโ€”even disagreeing publiclyโ€”is seen as engagement, not defiance. Silence there can be read as disengagement, whereas in India silence often communicates reverence.

When groups cross these cultural lines, misunderstandings multiply:
โ€ข A Western leader may perceive quietness as lack of participation, while for an Indian participant it may be the very act of showing respect.
โ€ข An Indian leader may hear objections as defiance, while for a Western participant it may be the clearest way to show commitment.

So how do we navigate this?

1. Name the cultural paradox upfront
โ€ข Say explicitly: โ€œIn some cultures, silence shows respect. In others, speaking up does. Letโ€™s talk about how we want to read these signals here.โ€
โ†’ This normalizes differences instead of leaving them unspoken.

2. Create a โ€œchallenge = careโ€ frame
โ€ข Reframe objections as a sign of investment: โ€œIf someone disagrees, it means they care enough about the group to offer another view.โ€
โ†’ This transforms dissent from threat into contribution.

3. Slow down your authority reflex: When you feel disrespected, pause. Ask yourself: โ€œAm I reacting to the contentโ€ฆ or to how my status feels questioned?โ€
โ†’ This builds self-awareness in leaders, preventing escalation.

4. Honor courage across the spectrum
โ€ข For the outspoken: โ€œThank you for risking disagreement.โ€
โ€ข For the quiet: โ€œThank you for holding space in silenceโ€”Iโ€™d love to hear whatโ€™s alive for you when youโ€™re ready.โ€
โ†’ Both speaking up and holding back require courage, depending on the imprint.

5. Co-create a new definition of respect
โ€ข Instead of assuming, invite: โ€œWhat would respect look like in this group, for this season of our work?โ€
โ†’ This shifts respect from inherited code to a living, evolving agreement.